Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150129085023.GA6572@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:50:23 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: the other glibc issue

Oh, can we use descriptive Subjects, please?  (I am leaving this one
intact not to introduce even further confusion.)

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0500, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> Use CVE-2013-7423 for ths initial bug report at 2013-09-12 09:50:17 UTC 
> stating: "Under high load, getaddrinfo() starts sending DNS queries to 
> random file descriptors, e.g. some unrelated socket connected to a remote 
> service."
> 
> Which comment says that the issue is unfixed?  The 2015-01-08 14:21:11 UTC 
> comment by David Nilsson says "I'm unable to reproduce the correct 
> behaviour," but does not suggest that the vulnerability is still present.

That comment you mention seemed to imply that, but here are the news off
Twitter:

<solardiz> glibc "getaddrinfo() writes DNS queries to random file descriptors under high load" https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15946 "Fixed in 2.20", reopened, CVE?
<@RichFelker> @solardiz Yeah I've been following this and pushing for it to be taken seriously for a long time...
<@RichFelker> @solardiz Looks like a false positive, a bug in the testcase rather than in #glibc. See https://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-bugs/2015-01/msg00226.html
<@solardiz> @RichFelker To me, this message says that the bug still being reproducible on glibc 2.20 is a false positive, but the fix in 2.20 was needed
<@solardiz> @RichFelker Someone should run the corrected testcase on pre-2.20 to see if the issue was reproducible before the fix or not

So glibc 2.20 appears OK, and we need to re-test older glibc - but from
the patch it looks like there was indeed this bug before 2.20.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.