[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPTtNW_=992qjV3aem8Z=h9f_nYLAE3nzbpgt-2qvM8PmJp4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:04:52 -0800
From: Reed Loden <reed@...dloden.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: xchat/hexchat don't properly verify
SSL certificates
You're welcome to check the "Accept invalid SSL certificates" box in that
case, but the default should be that SSL/TLS certificates are correctly
validated. :)
~reed
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Sam Dodrill <shadow.h511@...il.com> wrote:
> A lot of the time IRC networks will not pay for a verified SSL cert due to
> the fact that the kind of SSL cert they would need (a wildcard one) is
> financially prohibitive. I don't think this is a security bug with hexchat
> more a symptom of the fact that SSL combines encryption and identity
> verification where sometimes people only want the former.
>
> On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 10:58:51 AM Marc Deslauriers <
> marc.deslauriers@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2015-01-29 01:52 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > > As reported [1]:
> > >
> > > XChat did not verify that the server hostname matched the domain name
> in
> > the
> > > subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field in X.509
> > certificates. This
> > > could allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to spoof an SSL server if they
> > had a
> > > certificate that was valid for any domain name.
> > >
> > > The same code is used in hexchat.
> > >
> > > This was initially reported to hexchat in 2013 [2] and fixed last
> > November [3].
> > > I'm not sure if it should receive a 2013 or a 2014 CVE. Can one be
> > assigned to
> > > this?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081839
> > > [2] https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/issues/524
> > > [3]
> > >
> https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/c9b63f7f9be01692b03fa15275135a
> > 4910a7e02d
> > >
> >
> > Looks like XChat-GNOME is vulnerable also.
> >
> > Marc.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Marc Deslauriers
> > Ubuntu Security Engineer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
> > Canonical Ltd. | http://www.canonical.com/
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
