[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150106093932.GB9193@mail.corp.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:39:33 +0100
From: Vasyl Kaigorodov <vkaigoro@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: dir traversal in elfutils
Hello everyone,
> >Initial (terse) report:
> >https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2014-December/004499.html
> >
> >Fix (with analysis in commit message):
> >https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/elfutils.git/commit/?id=147018e729e7c22eeabf15b82d26e4bf68a0d18e
>
> Use CVE-2014-9486.
Something is not quite correct here, wasn't CVE-2014-9447 assigned to
this already?
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-9447
Thanks.
--
Vasyl Kaigorodov | Red Hat Product Security
PGP: 0xABB6E828 A7E0 87FF 5AB5 48EB 47D0 2868 217B F9FC ABB6 E828
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >A dir traversal vuln is fixed in elfutils:
> >
> >Initial (terse) report:
> >https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2014-December/004499.html
> >
> >Fix (with analysis in commit message):
> >https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/elfutils.git/commit/?id=147018e729e7c22eeabf15b82d26e4bf68a0d18e
> >
> >At least versions 0.152 and 0.161 are affected.
> >
> >Could CVE please be assigned?
> >
>
> Use CVE-2014-9486.
>
> ---
>
> CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority M/S M300
> 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
> [ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
