[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54A73280.2010909@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:06:24 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>,
Assign a CVE Identifier <cve-assign@...re.org>
Subject: Possible "new" CVE for Zoo directory traversal
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774453
Package: zoo
Version: 2.10-27+b1
Tags: security
Either the fix for CVE-2005-2349 (bug #309594) wasn't complete, or it
bit-rotted, because Zoo is still susceptible to directory traversal:
$ pwd
/home/jwilk
$ zoo x traversal.zoo
Zoo: /tmp/moo -- extracted
$ ls -l /tmp/moo
-rw-r--r-- 1 jwilk users 4 Jan 5 2015 /tmp/moo
The script I used to create the test case is available at:
https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/path-traversal-samples
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages zoo depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-13
--
Jakub Wilk
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2005-2349
--
Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud
PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
