[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1418910816.5935.15.camel@juliet.mcarpenter.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:53:36 +0100
From: Martin Carpenter <mcarpenter@...e.fr>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Running Java across a privilege boundry
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 10:45 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/754278
Could this have been caught in package QA with an automated check on
R(UN)PATH?
(If that exists, how did it get missed? If not, could it be added?
Where? https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org).
Alternatively: is there ever a good argument for truly relative (ie not
"relative to $ORIGIN") R(UN)PATH? What would break if runtime linkers
did not accept relative R(UN)PATHs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
