Products Openwall GNU/*/Linux   server OS Linux Kernel Runtime Guard John the Ripper   password cracker Free & Open Source for any platform in the cloud Pro for Linux Pro for macOS Wordlists   for password cracking passwdqc   policy enforcement Free & Open Source for Unix Pro for Windows (Active Directory) yescrypt   KDF & password hashing yespower   Proof-of-Work (PoW) crypt_blowfish   password hashing phpass   ditto in PHP tcb   better password shadowing Pluggable Authentication Modules scanlogd   port scan detector popa3d   tiny POP3 daemon blists   web interface to mailing lists msulogin   single user mode login php_mt_seed   mt_rand() cracker Services Publications Articles Presentations Resources Mailing lists Community wiki Source code repositories (GitHub) Source code repositories (CVSweb) File archive & mirrors How to verify digital signatures OVE IDs What's new

Message-ID: <20141104070610.GA17145@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:06:10 +0100
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
To: OSS Security List <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: CVE Request: polarssl

Hi,

https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/releases/polarssl-1.2.12-released

and

https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/releases/polarssl-1.3.9-released

have some security issues worth CVEs.

"On the security front this release fixes a mistake in the negotiation
introduced in PolarSSL 1.3.8. The mistake resulted in servers
negotiating a weaker signature algorithm than available. In addition
two remotely-triggerable memory leaks were found by the Codenomicon
Defensics tool and fixed in this release."

Ciao, Marcus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.