[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C281A17C31CFD745B242416D0E96EC6371806DA5@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:04:57 -0400
From: "Bendler, Ehren" <ebendler@...na.com>
To: "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: attacking hsts through ntp
The symmetric schemes do work, but due to data structure sizing only MD5 and SHA-1 hashed PSKs are supported:
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039
They imply in the comments that it will take a new version of the NTP RFCs to get support for stronger hashing schemes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Röttger [mailto:stephen.roettger@...il.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:17 AM
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [oss-security] attacking hsts through ntp
>What about RFC 5906 and the current authentication schemes
> (http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/authentic.html) ?
The protocol from RFC 5906 is completely broken:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/security.html
http://zero-entropy.de/autokey_analysis.pdf
The symmetric schemes are probably fine but hard to set up. But it looks like the NIST provides authenticated NTP:
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/auth-ntp.cfm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
