[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141008215824.GG6890@pc.thejh.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:58:24 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: openssh on linux rce in sftp-only mode
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:32:23PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
> >
> > I reported this to the OpenSSH developers, and although they included my
> > patch as a mitigation, they did not treat it as a vuln in OpenSSH.
> >
> > I believe that treating this as a hardening patch makes sense. The SFTP
> > server behaves exactly as documented, it allows access to the whole
> > filesystem. And on Linux, that happens to equal write access to the
> > process RAM, so you should never give that access to someone who
> > shouldn't be able to run arbitrary code.
> >
>
> I think one has to assume if a user has unrestricted sftp access, they can
> figure out how to do most anything. Even with the upstream hardening patch,
> it really only protects the sftpd process. Any other processes the user may
> own could be modified.
Not that easily - /proc/$pid/mem requires you to either be the same process
or be attached to it via ptrace, I think.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
