[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADk+mPDAUu+eX3Ovw0w1bP+ZYHQ26BtPc4E8oOxGD3aqnDaHTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:34:39 +0200
From: Rainer Gerhards <rgerhards@...adiscon.com>
To: Sven Kieske <s.kieske@...twald.de>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: vulnerability in rsyslog
2014-10-06 9:12 GMT+02:00 Sven Kieske <s.kieske@...twald.de>:
>
>
> On 06/10/14 08:40, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> > 2014-10-06 8:31 GMT+02:00 Sven Kieske <s.kieske@...twald.de>:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 30/09/14 18:41, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> >>> 2014-09-30 18:28 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:55:12PM +0200, Sven Kieske wrote:
> >>>>> I don't understand the following statement in the
> >>>>> pri-vuln.txt in section "Patches":
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Version 7.4.6, while no longer being project
> >>>>> supported received a patch and is also not vulnerable."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What was patched when this version is not vulnerable?
> >>>>> Or do you mean it is not vulnerable after the patch got applied?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> My apologies, this is a type that skipped past all proof-reading. It
> >> should
> >>> say "7.6.6", which is the v7 version released today. v7.4.x is not only
> >>> non-project supported, it's also heavily outdated and missing many
> other
> >>> patches as well (just to point this out).
> >>
> >> This still does not answer the above questions, it just changes the
> >> version number in your statement which led to my question.
> >>
> >>
> > you can view the complete patch set here:
> >
> > https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/commits/v7-stable
>
> This web page does list all commits to v7-stable.
> So I think you want me to dig through the code to find the answer to my
> question?
> I knew I could answer my question by going through the code, but I
> figured it would be easier to ask someone who is already familiar with it.
>
> It turned out I was wrong.
>
Sorry, it looks like I don't understand your question. 7.6.6 (7.6.7 today)
has no special patch file, because the version itself did receive the
necessary patches. If you'd like to see exactly which code was changed you
can also look at the totally-dead-version patches available here:
http://www.rsyslog.com/files/download/rsyslog/CVE-2014-3683-pri-vuln.tar.gz
If you prefer, I can also do a
$ git diff v7.6.5 v7.6.6
for you and post the result.
HTH
Rainer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
