Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:57:57 +0800
From: Shawn <>
Cc: Chet Ramey <>
Subject: Re: more bash parser bugs (CVE-2014-6277, CVE-2014-6278)

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Ed Prevost <> wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 2:11 PM, Shawn wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Chet Ramey <> wrote:
>>> On 10/1/14, 5:04 PM, Shawn wrote:
>>> Nope, this one fixes 7168/7169.  It's the equivalent of the
>>> `parser-oob' patch.
>>> I have patches that fix 6277/6278 that are in the pipeline.
>> oh, s0rry for the mistake...that'd be great if we can get the patch as
>> quickly as possible. Thanks.
>>> --
>>> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
>>>                  ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
>>> Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU
> Really!? Honestly!? "as quickly as possible"
What else could I say? A POC already released and a bunch of
customer's machines are waiting...even the only mitigation is in
GCC-lvl, which compile bash with ASLR/NX/PIE/CANARY.....too bad this

> Man, we really should rally together and at least send Chet a recovery
> beer basket or something.
that's for problem with beer. I'll try to catch up with Chet
in whatever random conferences;-) maybe two dozen beers

> --Ed
> Application & Network Security, Research Scientist

GNU powered it...
GPL protect it...
God blessing it...


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.