Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:08:04 -0400
From: Chet Ramey <>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Non-upstream patches for bash

On 9/29/14, 11:44 AM, wrote:
>> the parser is not locale-agnostic. Here's an example how it can be
>> exploited:
> The discussion in Issue22187 is about changing code in Python 2.x to
> work around this. However, is it useful to assign one new
> CVE-2014-#### ID for Bash, on the expectation that Bash was intended
> to recognize valid characters in zh_CN.GBK, but instead is identifying
> part of a two-byte character as a \ character, and this has security
> implications for products that attempt to do otherwise-correct quoting
> of untrusted strings for use in sh commands?

Can someone send me a test case to look at?

``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.