[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53E009ED.30704@reser.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:32:13 -0700
From: Ben Reser <ben@...er.org>
To: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
CC: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
OSS Security List <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Possible CVE request: subversion MD5 collision
authentication leak
On 8/4/14 12:38 PM, Tomas Hoger wrote:
> I believe the attack here is supposed to create a collision against MD5
> sums used as names of files under ~/.subversion/auth/svn.simple/.
> However, as attacker does not control realm strings for any of the
> trusted repositories, that would require preimage attack. The lack of
> (publicly) known efficient preimage attacks against MD5 should imply
> such attack is still only theoretical.
I think your understanding of the current state of MD5 collision attacks is out
of date. Chosen prefix attacks are possible. See:
http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/ChosenPrefixCollisions/
The MD5 hash is created off the data in the following format:
<$URL> $REALM
An attacker trying to take advantage of this only needs the $URL portion to
match their server. The $REALM can then be whatever data is required to make
the MD5 hash match the system they are trying to attack.
I know of nobody that has taken the time to generate a MD5 collision to take
advantage of this. But I'm pretty sure that it could be done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
