[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201407162034.s6GKYeMc024616@linus.mitre.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:34:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: vkaigoro@...hat.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: XSS in PNP4Nagios
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I suppose that CVE-2014-4740 will be used for something else in the
> future, right?
Actually it's essentially the opposite.
In an entry such as
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-4740 the
"REJECT" status can be considered an indication that no vulnerability
will ever have that CVE ID. We have not transitioned anything out of
REJECT in the past, and we do not envision doing that.
- --
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTxuFGAAoJEKllVAevmvmszbIIAL6mdsUzBnIp4C8pzUzwDSVY
ACK3Q1udQqCX+aOF3K4Iv3T1IqaqhCLYcGWeEgLjYoPuLV89XvMyLOjZjij4r5WC
6645q7xL5ZYCIJZQe9xIrs8FmWLBikPAT/Pqt4LwWPjjUs4rC2TprUkn300HkLTl
1tgulQEeTIUHezEuykyc7bGgGs4kmcHliJW8ElJvb9Z44APWWsojlqf2sdT+o8o4
+PVR3dg1K4Jzwjugom6GQ8ZTJpx1vkQPYVQzNtcgxTDmFLUZFkoySl/pgyTgiXNS
Uh7uRE/2w1/0sMpNYK3JX3rtHIrnoHVmjgHIgPhqAAJGrwSpaqgPe7PzQCpd31A=
=r33v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
