|
Message-ID: <20140512192629.GA15034@openwall.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 23:26:29 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE Request: seunshare and setexeccon issues On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:21:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:34:00AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> I'm not sure how many CVE numbers should be assigned here. As far as > >> I know, none have been assigned so far. > > > > I think you missed this: > > > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/05/08/1 > > > > in which CVE-2014-3215 was assigned. > > I did. Thanks. Does your CVE request still stand, or are you satisfied with this one CVE id for the interaction (not for a particular component)? > FWIW, it appears that common exim configurations are vulnerable, so > this might be worse than just an exposure. Please try to demo this. Thanks! Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.