[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140414055944.GA5226@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:59:44 +0200
From: Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer@...e.de>
To: cve-assign@...re.org
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: pam_cifscreds stack overflow
Hi,
About the patch: I was asked by upstream for a re-spin,
as they dont want the strlen() but have the snprintf()
return value checked. Previous patch is correct in my eyes,
but to let you know that there might be a different patch
upstream soon.
Sebastian
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:13:42AM -0400, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > We are tracking a patch at:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870168
> >
> > Fixing buffer overflow in cifskey, maybe also used in samba itself?
>
> Use CVE-2014-2830 for any product that is exploitable because of
> the use of sprintf as shown in:
>
> http://bugzillafiles.novell.org/attachment.cgi?id=585460
>
> Apparently one exploitable case is the pam_cifscreds product. We do not
> know whether there is an exploitable case in the cifs-utils package
> because of the:
>
> https://git.samba.org/?p=cifs-utils.git;a=blob;f=cifskey.c
>
> code. There might be other products using an essentially identical
> cifskey.c file.
>
> - --
> CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
> M/S M300
> 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
> [ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTR4e+AAoJEKllVAevmvmsXnkIAK1AI1cXGWICxk/efLoDVCTH
> hkyy/hFYpPa5/qsGoH9sbnHTCtFcHA/rwm2NLLuDCVNzw9C50e/w9mDWI21M4uN3
> ogRjeghZjz1ut1TpH6JFD9dnpcUI/JSdFl7vgWlWwmyNcYQowWlUMX/dR5lLnj14
> GMUZrHJXuutLUxnsGxX6MOStWRcC3QkOJZREJAdTsru9blhKYZHDsCtdaGQJpnIh
> ivAEOeYpKY5f+9lfEBbfelNh/G6p6gKjZtPMO0HXdfLXB5iUxLpx8gKNiRrRmzZw
> EM+s/XfzTnS+3OOy7iQyE1kLN44jPh0S85UuDZ9xxdkEQdEeUszr7TrLgF9s0cA=
> =5G8d
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
~ perl self.pl
~ $_='print"\$_=\47$_\47;eval"';eval
~ krahmer@...e.de - SuSE Security Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
