|
Message-ID: <CAJjO9Mk19ReZ0RE4PgMV+OG_4oZHqR54p3BHmSEJbO5N0r6wTA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:09:38 -0700 From: Fyodor <fyodor@...p.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: OT What are the delays in delivery of Fyodor's Full Disclosure list? On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>wrote: > Sorry for offtopic. > > What are the delays in the delivery in > Fyodor's Full Disclosure list? > It is because the list is not even three days old yet and already has more than 6,000 members and I'm still trying to set things up, including a team of list members to help moderate. But as of now, I'm still the only moderator and I need to sleep sometimes. I also have other projects to work on than just moderating fulldisclosure. Today at 17:06:09 +0200 I tried to post > to fulldisclosure@...lists.org, > now is 17:53:51 EET 2014 and neither I > received the message nor it is on the mirror. > I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to your message in the first 47 minutes. But it did eventually post: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Mar/397 "lightly moderated" is not far away from > "lightly pregnant" IMHO. > John tried to run the old fulldisclosure list unmoderated at first and it lead to a disastrous crapflood of furry porn and other non-security junk as soon as the list got big enough that trolls deemed it worthy to disrupt. He switched to moderation many years ago. I think he may have set auto-moderation for people who always post good stuff, and I hope we'll be able to do that too. If you want to try creating a fully unmoderated fulldisclosure list, nothing is stopping you, and I sincerely wish you the best. Cheers, Fyodor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.