[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALi+ztGQsawYKVetGQE4H9oVBLDZo9pG1qV-8VdqSuGzEPZCTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:39:04 -0800
From: Chris Palmer <snackypants@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: cryptographic primitive choices [was: Re:
Microsoft Warns Customers Away From RC4 and SHA-1]
On Nov 14, 2013 9:31 PM, "Kurt Seifried" <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
> So essentially in my head I see a couple slider bars, as they go
> towards the riskier end of the spectrum (e.g. protecting a CA
> certificate vs. protecting a single SSL session) stronger encryption
> is needed.
But the cost of setting the sliders all the way to the secure side is so
low, why bother making the distinction?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
