[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131114103310.GX22293@dhcp-25-225.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:33:10 +0100
From: Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>
To: Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de>, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: some unstracked linux kernel security fixes
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Petr Matousek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:32:52PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > drivers/uio/uio.c: mapping of physical memory to user space without proper size check
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7314e613d5ff
>
> there is a size check in uio_mmap() (the only caller of uio_mmap_physical()):
>
> requested_pages = vma_pages(vma);
> actual_pages = ((idev->info->mem[mi].addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
> + idev->info->mem[mi].size + PAGE_SIZE -1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> if (requested_pages > actual_pages)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> why it wasn't sufficient?
Apparently there was a CVE split [1] and this is now CVE-2013-6763.
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-6763
I still think this is a non-issue based on the above mentioned size
check. Can I please get second opinion from someone more knowledgeable
on this?
Thanks,
--
Petr Matousek / Red Hat Security Response Team
PGP: 0xC44977CA 8107 AF16 A416 F9AF 18F3 D874 3E78 6F42 C449 77CA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
