[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131104174830.GC26778@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:48:30 -0500
From: "Eric H. Christensen" <echriste@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: openssl default ciphers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:16:30PM +0100, Stefan Bühler wrote:
> I don't want to enforce PFS or break compatibility on purpose; so I
> think the default could be a little bit less "secure" than what I would
> actually recommend to use.
What software would we be breaking compatibility with? Perhaps it would be a good idea to start a list of software that can't handle HIGH ciphers and attempt to work with those developers to "fix" the problem.
- -- Eric
- --------------------------------------------------
Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Red Hat, Inc - Product Security Team
sparks@...hat.com - sparks@...oraproject.org
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
- --------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)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=DovG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
