oss-security - CVE Request -- Four (stack-based) buffer overflows and one use-after-free in libtiff v4.0.3 reported by Pedro Ribeiro

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <333828963.13226430.1375954935713.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 05:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
        Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>,
        Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam@...ox.com>
Subject: CVE Request -- Four (stack-based) buffer overflows and one
 use-after-free in libtiff v4.0.3 reported by Pedro Ribeiro

Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,

  Pedro Ribeiro has recently reported the following five security
flaws being present in the tools of TIFF library:
  [1] http://www.asmail.be/msg0055359936.html

While they are present in the tools (=> not that urgent like they
would be in the library itself), there's been CVE ids assigned
in the past for TIFF library tools issues too. To mention some examples:
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-1961
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-1960
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-4564
  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-3401

Since there doesn't seem to be CVE identifiers assigned for these
[1] issues yet, could you allocate them?

FWIW regarding the patches and upstream bugs - if my information
is up2date, there aren't upstream bugs and patches for these issues
yet.

Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.