Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1076240558.13016888.1375919725070.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 19:55:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Jorm <djorm@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, David Walser <luigiwalser@...oo.com>
Cc: marcus@....franken.de, lwn@....net
Subject: Re: tomcat CVE confusion

> OpenSuSE has issued an advisory for tomcat today:
> http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-08/msg00014.html
> 
> This is also linked from LWN here:
> http://lwn.net/Vulnerabilities/562439/
> 
> This CVE-2013-3544 is not mentioned on tomcat's security page:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
> 
> But CVE-2012-3544 is mentioned there (note the different year).
> 
> Based on this Novell/OpenSuSE bug report, I believe OpenSuSE made a typo:
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831119
> 
> I can't find any info about CVE-2013-3544, but the mitre page says it's
> reserved.  Perhaps that CVE has already been allocated for some other piece
> of software?  If so, this might cause some confusion.  I'm not sure how this
> should be handled, but I thought it would be appropriate to point this out.

+1 I think it is a typo. The correct CVE ID is 2012-3544:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-3544

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.