Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b7a4b6fd6d93ea18b0190a3f4542f79@imap.steindlberger.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:17:08 +0200
From: Jonas Meurer <jonas@...esources.org>
To: kseifried@...hat.com
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>,
 mejo@...ian.org, contribute@...ios.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: unauthorized host/service views
 displayed in servicegroup view

Hello,

Am 2013-07-08 20:16, schrieb Kurt Seifried:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 06/26/2013 01:42 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 12:36 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
>>> I don't believe a CVE has been assigned to this issue yet.
>> 
>>> It was reported that Nagios 3.4.4 at least, and possibly earlier
>>>  versions, would allow users with access to Nagios to obtain
>>> full access to the servicegroup overview, even if they are not
>>> authorized to view all of the systems (not configured for this
>>> ability in the authorized_for_* configuration option).  This
>>> includes the servicegroup overview, summary, and grid.
>> 
>>> Provided the user has access to view some services, they will be
>>> able to see all services (including those they should not see).
>>> Note that the user in question must have access to some services
>>> and must have access to Nagios to begin with.
>> 
>>> This has not yet been corrected upstream.
>> 
>>> References:
>> 
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg39749.html
>> 
>>>  http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=456
>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714171
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978531
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Please use CVE-2013-2214 for this issue.
> 
> It appears there are may be some problems with this issue, potentially
> this may have been a bad configuration and not a source code based
> problem, however we haven't been able to confirm it yet. I've also not
> been able to contact upstream about this easily (no security@ address,
> if anyone know whom to forward this to, please let me know, thanks.

I'm wondering why you fail to reproduce this issue. I posted some 
details regarding my setup at the Nagios Tracker: 
http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=456

Unfortunately Nagios upstream sometimes rather unresponsive. At least 
that's what I observed.

Please let me know if you need any further details regarding the bug or 
advice on how to reproduce it.

Kind regards,
  jonas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.