Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130618062412.GA22313@inutil.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:24:12 +0200
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@...til.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, kseifried@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Thoughts on a vuln/CVE?

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:04:30AM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:

> http://bits.debian.org/2013/06/remove-debian-multimedia.html

[..]

> We have software with a now insecure configuration as it points to a
> site that may or may not be under attacker control. It seems to me
> like this might be a candidate for a CVE. Thoughts and comments for
> and against are welcome (I'm on the fence myself).

No way. This is not an insecure configuration: This was never a Debian 
service and people are free to put whatever they want in /etc/apt/sources.list. 
There are hundreds of external apt sources and everyone of them could have
their owner changed at some point.

Also there's no security issue: If a domain is grabbed and someone configures
an apt repository on the site, he/she would lack the repository key previously
used to sign the repo.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.