[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515C45CE.6060904@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:07:58 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow
On 04/03/2013 04:55 PM, Sebastian Krahmer wrote:
> glibc resolver surprisingly seems to accept indeed larger
> UDP packets than DNS servers would send without EDNS0.
> But depending on setup its probably hard to get such large
> packets through your local recursive DNS, not to speak
> about the firewall. Maybe its possible to signal truncation
> and force a TCP connect?
Yes, this is with the TCP transport. With a suitably prepared zone, I
can get up to
$ getent hosts ... | wc -l
4093
A records (over DNS, just to be clear).
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
