Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130301215308.GA11297@elende>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 22:53:08 +0100
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: OSS Security Mailinglist <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: CVE Request: Gambas Directory hijack vulnerability

Hi Kurt

It was found that Gambas is vulnerable to a (temorary files) directory
hijack vulnerability. Here two references:

 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/116 (fulldisclosure)
 http://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=365 (upstream
 bugtracker)

Upstream also mentioned the following in their changelog for 3.4.0
release:

* BUG: Ensure that the interpreter temporary directory is owned by the
  current user and that its rights are accurate. Otherwise abort.
* BUG: When creating the process temporary directory, check the permissions
  of both the top directory (gambas.) and the process directory
  inside.

 http://gambasdoc.org/help/doc/release/3.4.0?view

Upstream fixes done via #5438 and #5464:

 http://sourceforge.net/p/gambas/code/5438/
 http://sourceforge.net/p/gambas/code/5464/

Can a CVE be assigned to this?

Regards,
Salvatore

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.