[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130220163937.GK2859@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:39:37 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: isync/mbsync security advisory: missing SSL
subject verification (CVE-2013-0289)
* [2013-02-20 09:19:04 +0100] Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>Christian Schneider <software [at] chschneider [dot] eu> discovered that
>isync does no SSL subject (hostname) verification.
>
>This means that any host with a valid certificate could pretend to be
>the wanted host, as long as the certificate store contained the relevant
>root certificate. This could be used for man-in-the-middle attacks, which
>could be used to steal passwords.
>
>Workaround: Specify a CertificateFile which contains only the wanted
>host's certificate, thus disabling trust chain based verification. Early
>versions of isync's SSL support tried to enforce this mode of operation.
>
>Isync releases 0.4 up to including 1.0.5 are affected. Version 1.0.6 has
>been just released to address the issue.
>
>Download: https://sourceforge.net/projects/isync/files/isync/1.0.6/
>Patch: http://isync.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=isync/isync;a=patch;h=914ede18664980925628a9ed2a73ad05f85aeedb
Note that this was disclosed to the distros@ list previously and had
been assigned the name CVE-2013-0289 (which the referenced patch notes
as well).
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
