[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmK7Bpqw4rDOi=+eG57b--o23o2_TSZRQEMW9daUQqJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:51:14 -0500
From: Eitan Adler <lists@...anadler.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: fw@...eb.enyo.de, cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum
On 12 February 2013 11:42, <cve-assign@...re.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>>It's been reported that some Intel 82574L network controllers can be
>>brought into a non-processing state by receiving certain Ethernet
>>frames:
>>
>><http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html>
>>
>>The packet is not malformed at the lower layers and will travel over
>>the Internet.
>
> Use CVE-2013-1634.
It should be noted that this is motherboard specific. In particular
only motherboard manufacturers that ignored Intel guidelines are
affected (acc' to intel).
Their official statement is here:
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement
--
Eitan Adler
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
