[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130121203927.GB2637@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:39:27 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request coreutils
* [2013-01-21 19:17:49 +0100] Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Can someone assign a CVE id for a buffer overflow in coreutils?
>> Its the same code snippet (coreutils-i18n.patch) and it affects sort, uniq and join:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798538
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796243
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798541
>
>Could you send the faulty patch to the list so that distros can validate
>that they don't include it themselves?
Red Hat/Fedora do include this patch, so it's more than just SUSE that
ships them. However, when I was looking at them last week, this struck
me as just a non-exploitable crash and unless I'm missing something, I
think it would be quite the stretch to call it a security flaw.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
