Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F9AAB8.5060303@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:04:08 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>,
        "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
        Tomas Hozza <thozza@...hat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- dnsmasq: Incomplete fix for the
 CVE-2012-3411 issue

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/18/2013 06:31 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,
> 
> the CVE-2012-3411 identifier has been originally assigned to the 
> following issue:
> 
> When dnsmasq is used in conjunctions with certain configurations of
> libvirtd, network packets from prohibited networks (e.g. packets
> that should not be passed in) may be sent to the dnsmasq
> application and processed. This can result in DNS amplification
> attacks for example. [1]
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/12/5
> 
> Later it was found: [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894486 [3]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894486#c3
> 
> the upstream patch for CVE-2012-3411 it not to be working
> properly, as it still allowed (from [3]):
> 
> * replies to remote TCP-protocol based DNS queries (UDP protocol
> ones were corrected, but TCP ones not) from prohibited networks,
> when the --bind-dynamic option was used,
> 
> * when --except-interface lo option was used dnsmasq didn't answer
> local or remote UDP DNS queries, but still allowed TCP protocol
> based DNS queries,
> 
> * when --except-interface lo option was not used local / remote TCP
> DNS queries were also still answered by dnsmasq.
> 
> Could you allocate a new CVE identifier for this? (as an incomplete
> fix for CVE-2012-3411 issue)
> 
> Thank you && Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat
> Security Response Team


Please use CVE-2013-0198 for this issue.

- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=H+Cc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.