Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50631F57.9040905@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:29:27 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>,
        "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
        Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@...hat.com>, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- 389-ds-base: Change on SLAPI_MODRDN_NEWSUPERIOR
 is not evaluated in ACL (ACL rules bypass possible)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/26/2012 03:54 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,
> 
> Noriko Hosoi of Red Hat notified us about the following
> deficiency:
> 
> A possibility to bypass access control list (ACL) definitions was
> found in the way 389 Directory Server performed LDAP modifyRDN
> operation upon request from client. When a user has been granted
> access to set of DN entries, but denied access to a specific subset
> of those entries, it was possible the user to obtain temporary
> (till next Directory Server restart) access to that subset of
> entries (they should not have had otherwise ability to access) when
> the DN entry was moved via database modify RDN function.
> 
> Upstream ticket: [1] https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/340
> 
> Relevant upstream patch: [2]
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/commit/?id=5beb93d42efb807838c09c5fab898876876f8d09
>
>  Could you allocate a CVE id for this?
> 
> Thank you && Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat
> Security Response Team

Please use CVE-2012-4450 for this issue.

- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=EtKB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.