[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504A2EFD.5060400@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:29:33 -0600
From: Jeff Law <law@...hat.com>
To: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- glibc: strcoll() integer overflow
leading to buffer overflow + another alloca() stack overflow issue (upstream
#14547 && #14552)
On 09/07/2012 11:21 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>> 2) Issue #2 (mentioned here only for completeness, but I am not of
>> the opinion this should receive a CVE identifier. See argumentation
>> below [but open to glibc upstream / others to disprove it]).
>
> I will hold off on issuing a CVE for this then. Anyone want to weigh in?
>> alloca() stack overflow (first issue from the report below)
>> Upstream bug report: [3]
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14552
>>
>> If I have looked correctly this is expected / known behaviour of
>> alloca() - from the manual page: [4]
>> http://linux.die.net/man/3/alloca
Just because it's known/expected behaviour doesn't mean it's not a
potential attack vector. Blowing out the stack is definitely a vector
for attack:
http://www.phrack.org/issues.html?issue=67&id=9#article
http://www.phrack.com/issues.html?issue=63&id=14#article
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
