[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC48846.3030906@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 10:26:46 +0200
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: "Apache OpenOffice.Org Security Team" <ooo-security@...ubator.apache.org>,
LibreOffice Security Team <officesecurity@...ts.freedesktop.org>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Caolán McNamara <caolanm@...hat.com>,
David Tardon <dtardon@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Kind request to update upstream CVE-2012-2334 advisories they
to reflect arbitrary code execution possibility too and OSS list notification
On 05/28/2012 05:09 PM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Apache OpenOffice.org, LibreOffice Security Teams, vendors,
>
> originally the CVE-2012-2334 security flaw has been described as follows:
> [1] http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2334.html
> [2] http://www.libreoffice.org/advisories/cve-2012-2334/
>
> during internal audit of relevant upstream patches:
> [3] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=28a6558f9d3ca2dda3191f8b5b3f2378ee2533da
> [4] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=512401decb286ba0fc3031939b8f7de8649c502e
>
> it has been observed by Florian Weimer that the [4] patch also corrected
> and integer overflow, being present in the SvxMSDffManager::GetFidclData()
> routine, which might lead under certain circumstances to possibility
> of arbitrary code execution too.
>
> Update CVE-2012-2334 flaw description is at:
> [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821803#c0
>
> This post is intended to serve as kind request to OpenOffice.org and
> LibreOffice upstream, they to update their corresponding advisories
> ([1], [2]) to reflect this fact.
>
> For what is related against upstream patches -- upon testing we can confirm,
> the original ones were complete and this is in no way a new security flaw.
>
> But something, which got corrected upstream in previous release(s), and
> should mention possibility of arbitrary code execution too in order to properly
> describe this deficiency.
>
> OpenOffice.org / LibreOffice upstreams - please update your advisories to
> reflect this if possible yet.
>
> OSS vendors, please note this notification (for case you previously categorized
> fix for the CVE-2012-2334 flaw as something to be postponed due to lower
> impact).
Hello Apache OpenOffice.org, LibreOffice Security Teams, vendors,
updating the credit information yet it to sound more correctly / appropriately:
>
> Credit for the discovery should go to: Florian Weimer of Red Hat
The above should have read as:
"Florian Weimer, Red Hat Product Security Team"
Please use this new / latter form in your advisories.
Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
>
> Thank you && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
>
> P.S.: Would you need further background details due this, contact me or
> Florian off list.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
