|
Message-ID: <4FBCDA57.2060907@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:38:47 +0200 From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com> To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Gerald Combs <gerald@...eshark.org> Subject: CVE Request -- wireshark: wnpa-sec-2012-08, wnpa-sec-2012-09, wnpa-sec-2012-10 Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors, the following recent Wireshark upstream advisories: A) http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-08.html References (upstream bugs and Red Hat bugzilla entry): [1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6805 (802.11) [2] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7118 (802.3) [3] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7119 (ANSIMAP) [4] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 (ASF) [5] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7121 (BACAPP) [6] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7122 (HCIEVT) [7] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7124 (LTP) [8] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7125 (R3) [9] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824411 B) http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-09.html References: [1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7138 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824413 C) http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-10.html References: [1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7221 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824419 doesn't seem to have CVE identifiers yet. Could you allocate three of them? Thank you && Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.