[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9CE456.6020301@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:48:54 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: weak use of crypto in python-elixir can lead to
information disclosure (CVE and peer review request)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2012 02:40 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> Could a CVE be assigned for the following issue?
>
> It was reported that python-elixir, a library for ORM mapping on
> top of SQLAlchemy with support for encrypting data stored in a
> database, suffers from weak use of cryptography. It uses Blowfish
> in CFB mode, which has an additional parameter (IV), which is not
> specified and thus defaults to zero. CFB mode is only secure if
> the the IV is unpredictable and different for every message.
> Because of this, and because the encryption key is shared for each
> database table (fields and rows), the same plaintext prefix is
> always encrypted to an identical and corresponding ciphertext
> prefix. As a result, an attacker with access to the database could
> figure out the plaintext values of encrypted text.
>
>
> References:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810013
> http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir/browse_thread/thread/efc16227514cffa?pli=1
>
> http://elixir.ematia.de/trac/ticket/119
Please use CVE-2012-2146 for this issue.
>
> So far there has been no response from upstream, and we have what
> I think is a suitable proposal to fix the flaw and a possible
> migration script to ease migrating from an insecure encrypted db to
> a secure one (noted in the google groups message).
>
> Not sure if anyone else is shipping python-elixir at all, but if
> you are, input on the proposed fix and migration script (in the
> absence of an upstream response) would be fantastic.
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Ut6W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
