Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120306204048.GG1220@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:40:48 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: smokeping XSS

* [2012-02-27 20:26:05 +0100] Florian Weimer wrote:

>* Vincent Danen:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783584
>
>Is the patch
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=556619
>
>really correct?  It does not strip the two magic characters "=
>(" should be enough, = is just defensive), so it's probably still
>possible to inject an onmouseover handler and CSS which enlarges the
>affected HTML element so that the handler is practically guaranteed to
>fire.
>
>I've just looked at the patch, I haven't got a (patched or unpatched)
>smokeping instance to test this.

Sorry, slowly catching up on mails here.

Whether that is right or wrong, I'm not 100% sure; you'd have to ask
upstream.  I just did the diff since I couldn't find a svn/git repo web
interface to generate a patch, so if it's wrong, then upstream has got
it wrong as well.

I see that Fedora has used a patch (not sure if it's the same or not),
so if I get a chance in the next few days I'll try the new version to
try to validate the fix.

-- 
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.