[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4BB11B.8050003@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:43 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Petr Sabata <psabata@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- Multiple instances of insecure
temporary file use
On 02/27/2012 05:07 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,
>
> multiple instances (by checking for ATM technology support, checking
> for Xtables
> extension support, checking for setns() system call support, and in
> dhcp-client-script example script) of insecure temporary file use were
> found
> in iproute. A local attacker could use this flaw to conduct symbolic link
> attacks (modify or remove files via specially-crafted link names).
>
> References:
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797878
>
> Upstream patches:
> [2]
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git;a=commitdiff;h=e557d1ac3a156ba7521ba44b0b412af4542f83f8
>
>
> [3]
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git;a=commitdiff;h=20ed7b24df05eadf83168d1d0ce0052a31380928
>
>
> Could you allocate a CVE identifier for this?
>
> Thank you && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Please use CVE-2012-1088 for these issues (same codebase/same
discoverer/same issue type/same version so merging).
--
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
