[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F42BF89.5090509@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:47:53 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
muuratsalo experimental hack lab <muuratsalo@...il.com>,
Ulli Horlacher <framstag@....uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: Vulnerabilitites in Debian F*EX <= 20100208 and
F*EX 20111129-2.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2012 07:54 AM, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi, * Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi> [2012-02-20 14:16]:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:15:10PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
>>> * muuratsalo experimental hack lab <muuratsalo@...il.com>
>>> [2012-02-20 12:51]:
>>>> I am Nicola Fioravanti aka muuratsalo | muuratsalo
>>>> experimental hack lab. I am writing you because I have
>>>> discovered some vulnerabilities in Debian F*EX <= 20100208
>>>> (stable) and F*EX 20111129-2. (testing and unstable) I have
>>>> already contacted the Author who confirmed the
>>>> vulnerabilities and applied the suggested fixes. A major
>>>> update of F*EX has been released on the 15th of February
>>>> 2012. The Debian Mantainer of the package is working on it.
>>>> Together with the Author we decided not to release any public
>>>> advisory before the release of the new Debian package.
>>>>
>>>> I would be grateful if you could assign CVE ids to the
>>>> discovered issues.
>>>
>>> I asked Nicola to send this to oss-security as the impact of
>>> this bug is fairly low in my opinion and the issue is public
>>> via the upstream changelog.
>>>
>>> Can someone please assign a CVE id to this? Given that all of
>>> the vulnerable input parameters are in the fup component, I
>>> guess one id should be sufficient.
>>
>> Is there a Debian bug-report about this issue?
>
> Yes, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660621
>
> Cheers Nico P.S. the bug report does not mention the other
> vulnerable parameters as I forgot those
Please use CVE-2012-0869 for this issue.
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=MISI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
