[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FF62C4D2C136E3458F2AA480ACC9791515DCA2EC@WIN-MMO0MBKKLR0.sefisasecure.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:21:53 +0000
From: Daniel Suarez <daniel@...isasecure.com>
To: "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: CVE request: surf
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Florian Weimer [mailto:fw@...eb.enyo.de]
Enviado el: viernes, 10 de febrero de 2012 16:11
Para: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Asunto: Re: [oss-security] CVE request: surf
* Kurt Seifried:
> On 02/09/2012 05:24 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> surf does not protect its cookie jar against access read access from
>> other local users, as reported by Jakub Wilk in this Debian bug:
>>
>> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659296>
>>
>> Could someone please assign a CVE for this?
>
> So for surf suckless (http://surf.suckless.org/) please use CVE-2012-0842
Oops. I mistook this for the HTTP client library. Your reference is
correct, and it appears I consistently wrote "surf" (the correct
spelling).
>> uzbl <http://uzbl.org/> (in the uzbl-browser wrapper script) and
>> netsurf <http://www.netsurf-browser.org/> (the nsgtk_check_homedir
>> function creates the dot directory with world-readable settings) have
>> a similar issue, but are from different code bases. I think those
>> should get distinct CVEs, too.
>
> I'll need advisories or code commits, or links to the vuln code to
> assign CVE's (I need more information). Thanks!
Jakub has filed bugs:
uzbl: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659379
netsurf: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659376
This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
