[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1201121219340.28039@faron.mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:31:08 -0500 (EST)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...-smtp.mitre.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...-smtp.mitre.org>,
Agostino Sarubbo <ago@...too.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request: Wireshark multiple vulnerabilities
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 07:20 PM, Steven M. Christey wrote:
>>
>> In this case, if a network monitor can be crashed, an attacker might
>> be able to launch an attack undetected. As such, NULL pointer
>> dereferences and other crashers in security-relevant products often
>> count for CVEs, so Kurt, please assign one for this.
>>
> From what I read the first #1 and #2 (secunia) map to wireshark
> wnpa-sec-2012-02.html and wnpa-sec-2012-03.html respectively, so they
> should be all good? Or did I misread it (this is entirely possible =).
No, my fault, sorry about that - I misread it. No new CVE needed. Using
Agostino's original request, Item 1 from SECUNIA:47494 is the same as
Wireshark item 2 (wnpa-sec-2012-02.html) as listed later in Agostino's
request, to which you had already assigned CVE-2012-0042. I originally
read this like there were separate requests, and I missed that there were
overlapping references that talked about the same issue.
- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
