Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F09F304.6080001@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:48:20 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Malicious devices & vulnerabilties

On 01/08/2012 07:19 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Xi Wang:
> 
>> I am wondering where to draw the line.  Should such device drivers
>> be considered vulnerable or not?  Thanks.
> 
> I think they should be considered vulnerable.  Some applications need
> some robustness to attacks even from the local console (e.g., student
> computer rooms).
> 
> USB is also a popular transport in many air-gapped environments.

I would consider them vulnerable with low security impacts. If you are
fixing such issues, do post them to the list.

Thanks, Eugene

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.