[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120106103832.GC23157@foo.fgeek.fi>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:38:32 +0200
From: Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, kseifrie@...hat.com
Cc: moderators@...db.org
Subject: Re: CVE-request: WordPress SQL injection and
arbitrary code injection (2003)
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:58PM -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 02:41 PM, Henri Salo wrote:
> > These two WordPress security vulnerabilities from 2003 are still without CVE-identifiers. I am requesting CVE-identifiers as these issues have highly critical impact.
> >
> > 1) SQL injection
> > http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/4610
> Please use CVE-2003-1598 for the WordPress 0.70
> ./wp-links/links.all.php SQL Injection
>
>
> >
> > 2) Arbitrary code injection
> > http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/4611
> Please use CVE-2003-1599 for the WordPress 0.70 ./blog.header.php
> code injection
> >
> > Secunia advisory: http://secunia.com/advisories/8954/
> >
> > - Henri Salo
> http://www.kernelpanik.org/docs/kernelpanik/wordpressadv.txt
>
> --
>
> -- Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
Thank you for the identifiers. Descriptions are switched.
4610 CVE-2003-1598 is about blog.header.php posts variable SQL injection
4611 CVE-2003-1599 is about links.all.php abspath variable RFI
OSVDB already added these to the advisories, but that can be easily fixed. In future I can add files affected and correct parameters to these requests for clarity. Sorry for the confusion, but could you tell me which CVE should be used for which vulnerability?
- Henri Salo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
