Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201112300306.pBU36JnQ005083@linus.mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:06:19 -0500 (EST)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: More CVEs? (was Re: [oCERT-2011-003] multiple implementations denial-of-service via hash algorithm collision)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here's the initial CVE assignment status for the 13 products listed
in oCERT #2011-003, plus ASP.NET. The CVE descriptions are available
at http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-#### URLs,
and will be on the MITRE CVE web site soon.

>Java

There's intentionally no CVE assigned by the MITRE CNA. The MITRE CNA
hasn't been proactively assigning CVEs to hash-table robustness issues
in implementations of general-purpose programming languages. As usual,
a CVE can be assigned for a software mistake that has a security
impact. Here, each maintainer of a language implementation can decide
whether there was a software mistake. The decision depends on what
robustness properties were intended. This happens to be a case in
which it's difficult for outside parties to discern what was intended.

>JRuby

CVE-2011-4838

>PHP

CVE-2011-4885

>Python

Again, there's intentionally no CVE assigned by the MITRE CNA because
this is an implementation of a general-purpose programming language,
and no implementation maintainer has requested a CVE.

>Rubinius

Again, there's intentionally no CVE assigned by the MITRE CNA because
this is an implementation of a general-purpose programming language,
and no implementation maintainer has requested a CVE.

>Ruby (only the Ruby MRI implementation)

CVE-2011-4815

>Apache Geronimo

CVE-2011-5034

>Apache Tomcat

CVE-2011-4084

At least at the moment, this CVE is intentionally not mapping to the
oCERT #2011-003 and n.runs-SA-2011.004 references. We might have a
pending REJECT on a closely related CVE that still has a reserved
status. This related CVE is the CVE referenced as "2011-12-16:
assigned CVE for Apache Tomcat" in the oCERT #2011-003 Timeline.

>Oracle Glassfish

CVE-2011-5035

>Jetty

CVE-2011-4461

>Plone

CVE-2011-4462

>Rack

CVE-2011-5036

>V8 JavaScript Engine

CVE-2011-5037

>ASP.NET

CVE-2011-3414

- -- 
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S S145
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/obtain_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (SunOS)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO/SlMAAoJEGvefgSNfHMdhn4H/2+MS345nwm/kHGPJDLZA5LP
WtmD56n2+na4SUZFh2kOT7vu/9MR6U6IXgp8gsMPPpFLfkDR4pp2s07NvtBzUKBy
C7DL4BN/GSEd70Gx1sku1oiFqREcNUt4eOmKZqRcURnz4M1yj25auKPWcoUecWPP
YJarbr1Ud795rJYFYBBxbt1sGqs+qKt54IriyQ1TDspZCcBPV4Jy0XrMAuRxme7y
AbHeVFM1aU+V4fZMOZz6B+2rQfhX3nWChuRj4F6ioABXkgjBRefL1vLAEbsb9IUS
PBi4VCOr7Exy0qkhEfACVqEtEKBJIAihzgG0CNa6mA9+CUq89vfppeH5/LJu8Uo=
=K98h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.