[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EFAAAE9.3030907@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:36:41 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@...ian.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments
On 12/24/2011 02:53 PM, Eugene Teo wrote:
>>> 2: /proc/$PID/{sched,schedstat} information leak
>>> Vasiliy Kulikov of OpenWall posted a demo exploit.
>>> http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/05/3
>>>
>>> AFAICS no CVE ID was assigned to this?
>> I believe we are not assigning CVE's for these types of proc related
>> issues, some discussion was had:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/7/368
>>
>> http://www.google.com/custom?domains=lkml.org&q=%2Fproc%2F+leaks
>>
>> but I'm not sure what the outcome is. CC'ing Eugene Teo.
===========
> IIRC, it's an issue but there's no resolution as existing code may break.
>
> There are also,
> /proc/{interrupts, stat}
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/7/340
Please use CVE-2011-4915 for this issue.
>
> /dev/pts/, /dev/tty*
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/7/355
Please use CVE-2011-4916 for this issue.
>
> I have not checked the status of these issues. Vasiliy, kindly shed some
> light.
>
> Happy holidays.
>
> Eugene
--
-Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
