[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF00C64.8010205@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:17:40 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Tim Sammut <underling@...too.org>
Subject: Re: CVE assignment from previous years
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/19/2011 07:52 PM, Tim Sammut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a general guideline that is commonly used when deciding to
> issue a CVE name from the pool of a previous year versus the current
> year's pool?
>
> thanks and hope all is well
> tim
>
Generally speaking the year the vuln was found or reported is the year
that gets used for the CVE. Example: I just assigned a CVE-2005.
- --
- -Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)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=Srqi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
