[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED7E273.5090701@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:24:19 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi>
Subject: Re: CVE-request: Serendipity 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]'
Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability
On 12/01/2011 10:12 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 02:59 AM, Henri Salo wrote:
>> Original post: http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2011/Nov/15
>> Advisory URL: http://www.rul3z.de/advisories/SSCHADV2011-015.txt
>> New version announcement: http://blog.s9y.org/archives/233-Serendipity-1.6-released.html
>>
>> I contacted Garvin Hicking and he said this is indeed fixed in 1.6 code, but they changed from SVN to Git so can't really refer to proper commit. Secunia is linking in http://secunia.com/advisories/46666/ to https://github.com/s9y/Serendipity/commit/1f037b462761cd592b90541ce4dfda2518ad4711, which has nothing to do with the actual issue. Shame on Secunia.
>>
>> This is one of logs, which can act like proof: https://github.com/s9y/Serendipity/commit/db590df6087969e5ef3b07b1b7040e7ec122a4fd
>>
>> Please notify me if this is not enough information.
>>
>> - Henri Salo
> Please use CVE-2011-4365 for this issue.
>
My mistake, this should have been merged into CVE-2011-4090, it's the
same vuln type (XSS) and the same version of Serendipity, CVE-2011-4365
is a bad assignment and should be marked as a duplicate of CVE-2011-4090.
--
-Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
