[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111122225135.GE10743@wopr>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:51:36 +0100
From: Guido Berhoerster <gber@...nsuse.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [LightDM] Version 1.0.6 released
* Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org> [2011-11-22 22:39]:
> On ven., 2011-11-11 at 13:27 -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:05 +0000, John Haxby wrote:
> > > On 11/11/11 08:06, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> > > > Replacing the file between the lstat and the open would change
> > > > its inode and then be caught by the check before the fchown, no?
> > >
> > > Nope. There is no reason why the same inode should not be reused.
> > >
> > > On ext4 (btrfs seems to be different):
> > >
> > > $ touch test; ls -i test; rm test; touch test; ls -i test
> > > 656078 test
> > > 656078 test
> > >
> > > jch
> >
> > How about the attached patch?
> >
> > Marc.
>
> Note that O_NOFOLLOW seems to be Linux-only. Any idea how to handle it
> on other ports?
No, it's specified in POSIX.1-2008, at least Linux, FreeBSD and
Solaris 10 implemented it long before that.
--
Guido Berhoerster
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
