[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8ED5EB.6050903@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:05:23 +0530
From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala <huzaifas@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: jskala@...hat.com, Reuben Hawkins <reubenhwk@...il.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: radvd 1.8.2 released with security fixes
On 10/07/2011 04:22 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> 2) An arbitrary file overwrite flaw was found in radvd's
> set_interface_var() function, where it did not check the interface name
> (generated by the unprivileged user) and blindly overwrites a filename
> with a decimal value by the root process. If a local attacker could
> create symlinks pointing to arbitrary files on the system, they could
> overwrite the target file contents. If only radvd is compromised (e.g.
> no local access), the attacker may only overwrite files with specific
> names only (PROC_SYS_IP6_* from radvd's pathnames.h). (CVE-2011-3602)
I am looking at the patch for this particular issue and it seems wrong
to me.
Patch:
https://github.com/reubenhwk/radvd/commit/92e22ca23e52066da2258df8c76a2dca8a428bcc
Shouldnt this be:
/* No path traversal */
if (strstr(iface, "..") || strchr(iface, '/'))
return -1;
--
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
