[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANoWnESGd+f8-d9LVnJMSyR7gNtnK4MBckD8_pu45PmbyJQ6Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:53:15 +1000
From: dave bl <db.pub.mail@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: security@...ntu.com, coley@...us.mitre.org
Subject: Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui
On 5 August 2011 03:53, Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 00:17 +1000, dave bl wrote:
>> > So while there aren't that many "users" of the old
>> > system-config-printer - it appears that debian old-stable (lenny)
>> > maybe vulnerable (where python-smbc is not available) ... is it
>> > worth
>> > while giving system-config-printer a 2008 CVE as well (if none
>> > currently exists).
>>
>> Yes, I think it is worth doing that.
>>
>
> This request doesn't really make any sense. It deserves a 2011 ID, that's
> when the flaw was discovered.
Ah ok, this why I asked ^ ^.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
