[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103080859.03319.ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:59:03 +0100
From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
Stefan Fritsch <sf@...itsch.de>, Florian Zumbiehl <florz@...rz.de>,
Petr Uzel <petr.uzel@...e.cz>, Thomas Biege <thomas@...e.de>,
Jan Kaluža <jkaluza@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- logrotate -- nine issues
Josh Bressers wrote:
> [...]
> It seems there is now a consensus on this (at least that's how I'm reading
> it). Here is what I plan to do with CVE ids unless someone speaks up.
>
> As best as I can tell, logrotate only needs a CVE id for this:
>
> 8) Issue #8: logrotate: TOCTOU race condition by creation of new files
> (between opening the file and moment, final permissions have been
> applied) [information disclosure]
>
Ack.
> We then will need to assign IDs for various broken uses of /var/log (If
> someone has a list of the currently known ones, please pass it along)
AFAICS on openSUSE Factory we have
cobbler
inn
safte-monitor
uucp
service owned log dirs without logrotate:
cups
horde
cu
Ludwig
--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
