[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110307080645.GF26611@core.inversepath.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:06:45 +0100
From: Andrea Barisani <lcars@...rt.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: Vendor-sec hosting and future of closed lists
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:08:31AM +0800, Eugene Teo wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:12:24PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >>So I would like to open up a discussion with _all_ OSS Security folks present.
> >>
> >>- Is a closed vendor coordination like vendor-sec still needed at this time?
> >
> >Yes, there's some need for it.
>
> I still see some value in having a closed mailing list for vendor
> co-ordination.
>
As suggested by Josh Bressers oCERT would be favourable to providing a system
that would accept user submission and allow selection of security contacts
from our existing member database as well as other verified contacts.
As Josh pointed out we do this already (even if manually and not with a web
selection thing or whatever) and I am open to explore ways to create more
cooperation.
We would also be willing to host and maintain a closed vendor-sec style
mailing list like the previous one with the only condition for member list to
be public (not necessarily the individual contact names but at least the
entities represented).
Cheers
--
Andrea Barisani | Founder & Project Coordinator
oCERT | Open Source Computer Emergency Response Team
<lcars@...rt.org> http://www.ocert.org
0x864C9B9E 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
